Lead-gen CASE STUDY · 05 / 10

Custom Home BUILDER

A luxury builder that needs a handful of great leads a month, not a flood of bad ones.

  • Google Ads
  • ◦ North America
  • ◷ Jan 2025 — Today
$130k
Ad spend managed
240
Design consultations
9%
Junk-lead rate
down from 41%
$14M
Estimated pipeline

The CLIENT

A custom home builder taking on a limited number of projects a year, with typical builds starting around $800k. Capacity, not demand, is the constraint.

The CHALLENGE

At this project size the goal is a few excellent conversations a month. Instead, the sales team was drowning in renovation requests, price-shoppers and out-of-budget enquiries: 41% of leads were junk, and the good ones were getting slow responses because of it.

What we DID

  1. Narrowed to high-intent, exact-match territory and let cheap-but-wrong traffic go to competitors.
  2. Rebuilt the landing page around qualification: budget range and timeline asked up front, before the phone number.
  3. Blocked junk lead sources at the form, so known-bad patterns never reach the CRM.
  4. Policed search terms hourly, because at $40-plus clicks a single bad query left running is real money.

The hourly clock effect

When every click costs a double-digit sum, waste compounds fast. The hourly search-term pass is worth more here per dollar of spend than on any other account profile we run.

The RESULTS

Junk-lead rate−78%
Before41%
After9%
Design consultations
240
Junk-lead rate
41% → 9%
Cost per consultation
−37%
Project pipeline
$14M

Want numbers like these on your account?